A Conversation Between Past and Present Chairs of the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Four Decades of History and the Future of Board Certification.

ABSTRACT: On the 75th anniversary of the founding of the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 11 of the surviving chairs of the board convened virtually to reflect on the past 40 years of major trends for the accrediting body of physiatrists. The field rapidly expanded in the 1980s, driven by changes in the reimbursement environment. This rapid expansion drove an improvement in the caliber of residents choosing the field and in the quality of training programs. As physical medicine and rehabilitation evolved from a small- to medium-sized specialty, the board addressed many challenges: securing a credible position within the American Board of Medical Specialties; addressing a rising demand for subspecialty certification; improving training and exposure to physiatry; enhancing the quality of the accreditation process; and reducing the burden of accreditation on diplomates. The future development of physiatry includes improving diversity, equity, and inclusion, while restoring provider morale, well-being, and meaningfulness in work. Although challenges remain, physiatry as a field has grown to be well established through the board's efforts and respected within the larger medical community.

Assessing the Field of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine's Interest in Expanding Fellowship Training to Pediatricians.

BACKGROUND: Training opportunities to pursue a career in pediatric rehabilitation medicine (PRM) have evolved over the last 40 years, with the most recent change being the development and accreditation of PRM fellowships and subspecialty certification in PRM. Currently the American Board of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (ABPMR) requires all candidates for PRM subspecialty certification to have completed a physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) residency. The small number of certified PRM physicians has prompted debate within the field about permitting pediatricians to enter PRM fellowships without having to complete a PM&R residency. OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of interest within the field of PRM in creating a pathway to PRM for pediatricians. DESIGN: Survey of pediatric physiatrists in the United States in 2017. SETTING: National. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric physiatrists. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Favorability toward pediatricians becoming certified in PRM. RESULTS: Most respondents (62%) were in favor of pediatricians having the opportunity to pursue training in PRM, with an increase in support (70%) after being introduced to workforce issues in PRM. Training time for pediatricians was the largest concern identified by respondents who were not in favor (80%), with additional themes identified including dilution of the essence of the field and operationalization issues. CONCLUSIONS: With a small number of practicing pediatric physiatrists, the growing number of children with disabilities, and the limited access to our services, most pediatric physiatrists are in agreement that it is time to consider the opportunity to expand the PRM workforce by creating a fellowship pathway to subspecialty board certification in PRM after pediatric residency.

Kernohan-Woltman Notch Phenomenon in Two Patients with Subdural Hematoma and Ipsilateral Hemiparesis.

CASE 1: A 9-yr-old boy presents with right subdural hematoma and ipsilateral hemiparesis. Clinical presentation and imaging are consistent with Kernohan-Woltman notch phenomenon. CASE 2: A 19-yr-old man presents with right subdural hematoma and ipsilateral hemiparesis. Clinical presentation is consistent with Kernohan-Woltman notch phenomenon. CLINICAL PEARL: Kernohan-Woltman notch phenomenon is a false-localizing neurologic sign that presents with hemiparesis ipsilateral to the primary lesion. It occurs in the setting of transtentorial herniation, during which the contralateral cerebral peduncle is compressed against the free edge of the tentorium, causing compression of descending corticospinal tract fibers.

Quality Improvement Education in Residency Training: A Review.

Hospitals and healthcare institutions have strong external and internal pressures to improve patient safety and healthcare quality. Quality improvement education has been mandated for resident physicians by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. This review describes didactic and experiential curricula for residents in quality improvement interventions as well as factors that create challenges to implementing such a curriculum and those that foster it. Resident attitudes, faculty capacity, institutional resources, and dedicated time are critical elements influencing the success of quality improvement curricula. Faculty interest in quality improvement could be enhanced by academic recognition of their work. Recommendations to facilitate publication of quality improvement efforts are described.

Performance of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Candidates on the Subspecialty Board Certification Examination from 2003 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric rehabilitation medicine (PRM) physicians enter the field via several pathways. It is unknown whether different training pathways impact performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) PRM Examination and Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Examination. OBJECTIVES: To describe the examination performance of candidates on the ABPMR PRM Examination according to their type of training (physiatrists with a clinical PRM focus, accredited or unaccredited fellowship training, separate pediatric and physical medicine and rehabilitation residencies, or combined pediatrics/physical medicine and rehabilitation residencies) and to compare candidates' performance on the PRM Examination with their initial ABPMR certification and MOC Examinations. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation office. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 250 candidates taking the PRM subspecialty certification examination from 2003 to 2015. METHODS: Scaled scores on the PRM Examination were compared to the examinees' initial certification scores as well as their admissibility criteria. Pass rates and scaled scores also were compared for those taking their initial PRM certification versus MOC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Board pass rates and mean scaled scores for initial PRM Examination and MOC. RESULTS: The 250 physiatrists who took the subspecialty PRM Examination had an overall first-time pass rate of 89%. There was no significant difference between first-time PRM pass rates or mean scaled scores for individuals who completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited fellowship versus those who did not. First time PRM pass rates were greatest among those who were also certified by the American Board of Pediatrics (100%). Performance on Parts I and II of the initial ABPMR Certification Examination significantly predicted PRM Examination scores. There was no difference in mean scaled scores for initial PRM certification versus taking the PRM Examination for MOC. CONCLUSIONS: Several pathways to admissibility to the PRM Examination afforded similar opportunity for diplomates to gain the knowledge necessary to pass the PRM Examination. Once certified, physicians taking the PRM Examination for MOC have a high success rate of passing again in years 7-10 of their certification cycle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A Novel Protocol for Contact Isolation for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Children on Inpatient Rehabilitation and Effects on Functional Outcomes: A Noninferiority Study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of contact isolation for multidrug-resistant organisms is increasing in acute hospitals and inpatient rehabilitation units alike. There is limited evidence on the effect of contact isolation on functional outcomes during inpatient rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of a modified contact isolation protocol (MCI) resulted in noninferior functional outcomes compared with children without contact isolation (NCI) on inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: This is a retrospective noninferiority study. SETTING: One academically affiliated pediatric inpatient rehabilitation unit located in a children's hospital. PATIENTS: All children with any diagnosis admitted to inpatient rehabilitation from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2014. METHODS OR INTERVENTIONS: We compared functional outcomes for 2 groups of children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measures included the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) efficiency and the change in the Developmental Functional Quotient (DFQ) for the WeeFIM. Noninferiority margins of 0.63 for the WeeFIM efficiency and 0.092 for the change in DFQ for the WeeFIM were used. RESULTS: There were a total of 949 patients of whom 899 were NCI, 48 MCI, and 2 excluded due to missing information. Patients with MCI had functional outcomes that were noninferior to those with NCI including the WeeFIM efficiency (mean difference 0.002, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.404) and the change in DFQ for the WeeFIM (mean difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.058 to 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The modified contact isolation protocol, having resulted in noninferior functional outcomes in inpatient rehabilitation may provide adequate contact isolation while allowing for noninferior functional outcomes. This may be a guide in the face of an ever-increasing need for contact isolation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Subacute Progressive Myelopathy: Transverse Myelitis or Subacute Combined Degeneration? A Case Report.

Evolving subacute myelopathies have many possible etiologies. This is a report of a patient who presented with progressive paresthesias, proprioceptive loss, and gait disturbance with acute myelitis seen on magnetic resonance imaging initially concerning for transverse myelitis. However, she also had vitamin B12 deficiency, and her clinical course ultimately suggested a diagnosis more compatible with subacute combined degeneration. The clinical features, laboratory, and imaging findings and prognosis of the 2 disorders are compared. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Does the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Self-Assessment Examination for Residents Predict the Chances of Passing the Part 1 Board Certification Examination?

BACKGROUND: Each year, residents in accredited United States Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR) residency programs can take the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) Self-Assessment Examination for Residents (SAE-R). This 150-question, multiple-choice examination is intended for self-assessment of physiatric knowledge, but its predictive value for performance on the part 1 American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Certification Examination (ABPMR-CE) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictive value of the SAE-R in relation to the part 1 ABPMR-CE. DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Data were analyzed from first time takers of the part 1 ABPMR-CE during a 5-year period from 2010 through 2014 who took at least 1 SAE-R in the third or fourth postgraduate year (PGY) of residency. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Raw scores from the SAE-R were compared with scaled scores on the part 1 examination. Regression models analyzed the predictive value of the SAE-R total score for each PGY level. RESULTS: SAE-R raw scores increased an average of 5.5 points between the PGY 3 and PGY 4 year. PGY3 SAE-R raw scores accounted for 24.8% and PGY4 SAE-R scores for 27.1% of the variance in part 1 ABPMR-CE scores (P < .0001). Residents who obtained a raw score greater than 80 (53% correct) on the SAE-R had an 80% or greater chance of passing the ABPMR-CE. Scores greater than 90 (60% correct) on the SAE-R were associated with a 95% chance of passing the ABPMR-CE. CONCLUSION: The SAE-R scores provide some information regarding the likelihood of passing the part 1 certification examination. This study supports the SAE-R as a means of providing PMR residents with feedback regarding their level of knowledge.

Role of dorsal rhizotomy in spinal cord injury-induced spasticity.

Selective dorsal rhizotomy may have a role in the management of spinal cord injury (SCI)-induced spasticity. Spasticity and spasms are common sequelae of SCI in children. Depending on the clinical scenario, treatments may include physical and occupational therapy, oral medications, chemodenervation, and neurosurgical interventions. Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is used in the management of spasticity in selected children with cerebral palsy, but, to the authors' knowledge, its use has not been reported in children with SCI. The authors describe the cases of 3 pediatric patients with SCI and associated spasticity treated with SDR. Two of the 3 patients have had significant long-term improvement in their preoperative spasticity. Although the third patient also experienced initial relief, his spasticity quickly returned to its preoperative severity, necessitating additional therapies. Selective dorsal rhizotomy may have a place in the treatment of selected children with spasticity due to SCI.

New challenges for the graduate medical educator: implementing the milestones.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs will face new challenges as they implement the Milestones and establish a Clinical Competency Committee, new requirements in the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education's Next Accreditation System. The milestones require programs to measure the capabilities of individual residents, and programs will be expected to show how residents progress to successively higher levels of behavior during the course of the residency. Program directors will be assisted by a committee of faculty whose role is to assess each individual resident's attainment of milestones and assist in the early identification of residents not making the expected progress. Programs will need to evaluate their assessment programs and will need to create a coherent mix of instruments to evaluate all of the milestones. Because the milestones are based on observable behaviors, a key component of this system will be direct observation by faculty of residents during patient care. However, many faculty are not trained in this skill. Faculty development in observational skills, workplace-based assessment skills, and providing formative feedback will be a very important aspect if the milestones are to be successfully used to help residents make developmental progress in their clinical competence.

Reliability of the physical medicine and rehabilitation resident observation and competency assessment tool: a multi-institution study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the psychometric qualities of a method of resident physician evaluation by faculty. DESIGN: Multicenter study by seven Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation training programs. Faculty physicians observed residents in brief patient encounters or teaching sessions, rated specific competencies, and provided residents with immediate feedback. The resident observation and competency assessment form included competencies in patient care, professionalism, interpersonal and communication skills, systems-based practice, and practice-based learning and improvement. Residents and faculty rated satisfaction with the process. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-two ratings were completed on 88 different residents. Each resident received an average of 3.8 ratings across two academic years. Overall internal consistency reliability was high (0.98); reliability of the individual competencies ranged from 0.74 to 0.76. Item means were correlated with year of training for two skill sets, with higher means for more experienced residents. The majority of participants gave high ratings of satisfaction; correlation between satisfaction ratings of attending and resident physicians was 0.63 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The resident observation and competency assessment is a reliable method to assess resident skills in five of six general competencies. Construct validity of the tool is supported by the fact that faculty rated two skill sets higher for senior residents.

Reliability of a 360-degree evaluation to assess resident competence.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and psychometric qualities of a 360-degree evaluation of physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) residents' competence. DESIGN: Nurses, allied health staff, and medical students completed a 12-item questionnaire after each PM&R resident rotation from January 2002 to December 2004. The items were derived from five of the six competencies defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). RESULTS: Nine hundred thirty evaluations of 56 residents were completed. The alpha reliability coefficient for the instrument was 0.89. Ratings did not vary significantly by resident gender. Senior residents had higher ratings than junior residents. A reliability of >0.8 could be achieved by ratings from just five nurses or allied health staff, compared with 23 ratings from medical students. Factor analysis revealed all items clustered on one factor, accounting for 84% of the variance. In a subgroup of residents with low scores, raters were able to differentiate among skills. CONCLUSION: Resident assessment tools should be valid, reliable, and feasible. This Web-based 360-degree evaluation tool is a feasible way to obtain reliable ratings from rehabilitation staff about resident behaviors. The assignment of higher ratings for senior residents than junior residents is evidence for the general validity of this 360-degree evaluation tool in the assessment of resident performance. Different rater groups may need distinct instruments based on the exposure of rater groups to various resident activities and behaviors.

Anterior spinal artery syndrome in two children with genetic thrombotic disorders.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord infarction is a well-described, but rare, etiology of myelopathy, especially in children. The most common syndrome, anterior spinal artery syndrome (ASAS), is caused by interruption of blood flow to the anterior spinal artery, producing ischemia in the anterior two-thirds of the cord, with resulting neurologic deficits. Causes of ASAS include aortic disease, thoracolumbar surgery, sepsis, hypotension, and thromboembolic disorders. METHODS: Case reports of 2 patients. RESULTS: Two children developed spinal cord infarctions consistent with ASAS, mostly likely caused by previously undiagnosed thrombotic disorders. A child with prothrombin variant experienced acute bilateral lower limb weakness without any preceding event. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed increased T2 signal in the anterior cord from midthoracic level to the conus medullaris. A child with protein S deficiency developed lower limb weakness 1 day after a posterior thoracolumbar fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Computed tomography (CT) myelogram revealed no spinal cord compression. The prothrombin variant mutation is associated with a 2-fold risk of thrombotic events. Individuals with protein S deficiency have an 8-fold increased risk of thrombosis. CONCLUSION: As knowledge of the coagulation pathways grows, it is likely that more patients with spinal cord infarctions will be diagnosed with genetic thrombotic disorders as the etiology of their injury. We review these two disorders, prothrombin variant and protein S deficiency, and the considerations for long-term anticoagulation.

Psychiatric illness after mild traumatic brain injury in children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of psychiatric illness 3 years after mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with 3-year follow-up. SETTING: Emergency department, hospital, and outpatient clinics in a large health maintenance organization. PARTICIPANTS: Children, 14 years old or less (n=490), who sustained a mild TBI in 1993. Three TBI unexposed subjects per TBI exposed patient were matched by sex, age, and enrollment at the time of injury (n=1470). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Computerized records were examined to identify psychiatric diagnoses, psychiatric medication prescription, and utilization of psychiatric services for the year before TBI and 3 years after. Adjusted relative risks for incidence of psychiatric illness were estimated for those with and without a premorbid psychiatric disorder. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence estimates for any psychiatric illness in the 3 years after mild TBI were 30% in children exposed to mild TBI and 20% in unexposed children (P=.0001). Cumulative incidence estimates were particularly high in both TBI exposed (55%) and unexposed children (63%) who had psychiatric illness in the year before the index TBI (psychiatric history). The exposed and unexposed children with psychiatric history did not have significantly different estimates of incidence during follow-up for any of the studied indicators of psychiatric illness. In those with no psychiatric history, 26% of exposed and 16% of unexposed children (P<.0001) had evidence of a psychiatric illness in the 3 years after mild TBI. For those with no psychiatric history, the adjusted relative risk estimate of any psychiatric illness in TBI exposed versus unexposed children, in the first year after TBI, was 2.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.9). Children with mild TBI but no psychiatric history were at higher risk for hyperactivity (diagnosis of hyperkinetic syndrome of childhood or prescription of psychostimulants) in the first year after injury (incidence, 3%; first year relative risk, 7.59; 95% CI, 2.7-21.6). CONCLUSIONS: In the 3 years after mild TBI, children with no evidence of prior-year psychiatric history were at significantly increased risk for psychiatric illness, particularly hyperactivity in the first year after injury. Prior-year psychiatric history conferred a significant independent risk for subsequent psychiatric illness. There was no evidence for an additional increase in risk in the 3-year follow-up that is attributable to mild TBI in children with prior psychiatric history.

Fibrocartilaginous embolism--an uncommon cause of spinal cord infarction: a case report and review of the literature.

Fibrocartilaginous embolism is a rare cause of spinal cord infarction. It is postulated that an acute vertical disk herniation of the nucleus pulposus material can lead to spinal cord infarction by a retrograde embolization to the central artery. An increased intradiskal pressure resulting from axial loading of the vertebral column with a concomitant Valsalva maneuver is thought to be the initiating event for the embolus. We present a previously healthy 16-year-old boy with sudden onset of back pain and progressive paraparesis within 36 hours after lifting exercises in a squat position. His clinical presentation and neuroimaging studies were consistent with spinal cord infarction resulting from a central artery embolus at the T8 spinal cord level. Laboratory investigation showed no evidence of infectious, autoimmune, inflammatory, or neoplastic causes. Although no histologic confirmation was obtained, lack of evidence for other plausible diagnoses in the setting of his clinical presentation and in the magnetic resonance imaging findings made fibrocartilaginous embolism myelopathy the most likely diagnosis. We postulated that some cases of transverse myelitis might actually be fibrocartilaginous embolism, making it a more prevalent cause of an acute myelopathy than commonly recognized. Relevant literature and current theories regarding the pathogenesis of fibrocartilaginous embolism myelopathy are reviewed.